so is it correct to state that the workaround setting block~ size down to 1 for sample correct works is not existant for
most (maybe all, not sure) signal-to-message objects
have a minimum hard limit of 64 samples.
On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 16:04 -0500, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:Sorry for not reading your post carefully. That's indeed what you said.
>
> On 12/23/10 8:51 AM, Roman Haefeli wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-23 at 08:10 -0500, Mike Moser-Booth wrote:
> >> [bang~], [edge~], and [threshold~] I've noticed for sure are like this.
> >> I don't know about [vline~] since I use it to avoid having to change the
> >> block size. :-)
> > I happily repeat myself:
> > There is no need to adjust the block size when using [vline~].
>
> Yeah, that's what I was trying to say.
Roman
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list