On Dec 9, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Frank Barknecht wrote:
Hallo, Hans-Christoph Steiner hat gesagt: // Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
Hmm, you'd have to add the [switch~] AFAIK. But it would be really nice if it handled that for you. That should be possible by having a [switch~] in nqpwrap.pd and make it controlled by the allocation logic. That would be very slick and not too difficult.
I would prefer to have my own control over switching, so I would not like this to be included in nqpoly4 directly. This is especially important if one is not using any of the inlets of nqpwrap at all like in the additive synth examples I just posted. It's trivial to add switching to the abstraction, which must be written anyway.
Yeah, I was just thinking that same thing, that it would be useful to
have both one with automatic [switch~]ing, and one without. It seems
to me that if you want one to do voice allocation/management stuff,
then that should have built in [switch~] function. But to do
instance creation and management, that would not have the [switch~]
stuff built in.
I wonder if there is a straightforward way to make both, having them
share relevant code...
.hc
News is what people want to keep hidden and everything else is
publicity. - Bill Moyers