On Tue, Nov 20, 2007 at 01:56:19PM +0100, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
errordeveloper@gmail.com wrote:
the Makefiles in the pd CVS tree are very are definetly not good. they needs fixing globaly. who is responsible for the CVS ?
nobody. the authors are responsible for their stuff. so: if zexy/src/Makefile is broken, it is my fault...
i think that all of them have to be generalised ,so we can easiely build anything. i do everything manually on my system, cause quite a few makefiles try to use -m32 in CFLAGS and many of them need -fPIC to be added.
at least the pd-sources (+externs) have fixed this by now. i think the (erroneous) use of the "-m32" flag in pd-0.40 convinced several developers to add this flag to their makefiles.
i kidda realise thatr as well .
there basic externals , which don't have any ./configure part, i think we need to work on those first , leaving Gem and DataFlow aside ..
GridFlow you mean?
ah , sure yeah :)
also there is acouple of external which have duplicated objects.
what do you mean here? nameclashes? duplicated functionality? aliases?
yeah ..i can't remenber, but when i used my strategy:
#'
foreach pde (find -iname '*.pd_linux'
)
ln -s $pde /opt/audio/lib/pd/ext/cvs-all/
end
#'
i found some file with the same names .., and they seemd to copy some stuff
from on external directory into anothr in order to resolvetheir little
dependency , i suppose ..
such things should be included in some guidelines may be, if we wish to have any guide lines as such .
fmga.sdr IOhannes