No, the regression isn't much different, it's more that things such as "dynamic patching" were never really intended form the start and became canon, to some extent.
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2020 10:46:07 +0100From: "Peter P." <peterparker@fastmail.com>To: pd-list@lists.iem.atSubject: Re: [PD] [r pd-dsp-started] was: Re: samplerate~Message-ID: <20200219094607.tsx4tjipkr32ystw@fastmail.com>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii* Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com> [2020-02-19 10:38]:I would also point out that internal messages such as pd-dsp-started don't really come with an expected behavior for user patches. Saying how it works is a "bug" belies that fact that I don't believe it was ever intended to be used for this and just because it can be grabbed via a [r] also doesn't guarantee anything.
The method you point out is shown in the help patch of [samplerate~]without any reference that it should be considered a bug or temporarymeasure.This is also why it's so hard to change almost *any* behavior within Pd as you can never really be 100% certain you aren't breaking someone's end use case.
Do you feel this regression condition is much different in other software?best, P