> I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla

Maybe because it lives in extra/ instead of src/ ?

What is extra/ there for, by the way? I remember it being mentioned in msp's paper that introduced [pd~], but not sure why it is still there.
Giulio


________________________________
From: Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>
To: "pd-list@lists.iem.at" <pd-list@lists.iem.at>
Sent: Monday, 6 February 2017, 17:13
Subject: Re: [PD] test audio signals: Are there <~ and >~ objects?

2017-02-06 11:00 GMT-02:00 Peter P. <peterparker@fastmail.com>:
Thanks IOhannes and Roman! Funny there are no internal objects for this.
>best, P
>

[expr~] is an internal

2017-02-06 11:11 GMT-02:00 cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net>:
for a vanilla only solution, you can use tabread~ with a 2 point table...
>

I don't know why [expr~] is usually not considered vanilla

the vanilla solution is with [expr~], which is an internal in vanilla


cheers

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list