Am I missing something or wouldn't it be simplest to add a quick and dirty 5 ms or so fade in/out envelope that follows the timing of the array triggers?
~Kyle
Hi Lau,
I guess you're building a beat concatenator so you have no
room for introducing timing offsets.
First, termminology - let's not call these "clips", I think
discontinuities is a better word.
Your first solution is similar to what is being discussed in another
thread on dynamic delays - Millers "rendezvous" algorithm where
the two segments are spliced via a DC offset introduced by a ramp.
The second one really amounts to crossfading or short window
average filter. Further, how can you
be sure your detector won't have a false positive from a fast
signal slew rate?
If my assumption is right then for simplicity I suggest
revising your constraints. A 64 sample crossfade will introduce
negligable timing problems.
--
Use the source
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list