Am I missing something or wouldn't it be simplest to add a quick and dirty 5 ms or so fade in/out envelope that follows the timing of the array triggers?

~Kyle

On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Andy Farnell <padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk> wrote:

Hi Lau,

I guess you're building a beat concatenator so you have no
room for introducing timing offsets.

First, termminology - let's not call these "clips", I think
discontinuities is a better word.

Your first solution is similar to what is being discussed in another
thread on dynamic delays - Millers "rendezvous" algorithm where
the two segments are spliced via a DC offset introduced by a ramp.

The second one really amounts to crossfading or short window
average filter. Further, how can you
be sure your detector won't have a false positive from a fast
signal slew  rate?

If my assumption is right then for simplicity I suggest
revising your constraints. A 64 sample crossfade will introduce
negligable timing problems.


--
Use the source

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--
-----
------------
   ----     -----
---- -------- - ------
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com
http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz