12 Aug
2006
12 Aug
'06
9:40 p.m.
Hi Julian,
i have no aversion to using [dyn~] - but i'll be calling numerous
instantiations of this abstraction, and i've found before that
using [dyn~] in that situation is a bit slow ... so i'd prefer to
use patch messages if i can ...
could you send me such an example where dyn~ is noticeably slower
than patch messages? If possible i would like to improve the situation.
greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org