True - i could never understand why this isn't the case. But i
remember that there have been related discussions on the list months
or years ago
greetings, Thomas
Am 16.08.2007 um 19:10 schrieb marius schebella:
it is a pity that there is no $0 in messages. that would help so much! most of the time I use local send/receive like s $0-blabla. with messages you always have to mess with workaounds to achieve the
same result. marius.Roman Haefeli wrote:
i don't know if there is a technical difference in efficiency, but
there is a difference in use. at least before 0.40, using [; $1 $2( was the only way to achieve a settable send. there is also a cosmetic aspect: if you want to collect some initial values together at some place, it is much nicer to have only one
message box, where all values can be stored instead of having a[loadbang] | [13] | [s value]
construction for each value.
this:
[loadbang] |__________________ |; / |value 34 | |somevalue 127 | |othervalue 57 | |yoyo 1___________\
looks much nicer and is easier to edit, isn't it?
roman
On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 12:36 -0400, marius schebella wrote:
Hey, when I look through miller's tutorial patches, I often find ";- messages" instead of a send object like: [;detune $1( vs [s detune] I wonder why, is there a significant difference? is one more
efficient then the other (if yes, I always thought send is more efficient..?). this is not urgent, I can sleep without an answer! just curious. marius.
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list
___________________________________________________________ Telefonate ohne weitere Kosten vom PC zum PC: http:// messenger.yahoo.de
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list