my head is completely fried now. i think this is the fourth thing i tried, and now i got it to work. ouch. looks like a total shambles. but it works.
http://imgur.com/a/ZhWWS

not sure i can look at that image i linked, and what you suggested, and make sense of it.. gotta crash.
i guess there's a better way of doing this shambles?


On 10 January 2017 at 23:54, Claude Heiland-Allen <claude@mathr.co.uk> wrote:
On 10/01/17 21:31, Esa Ruoho wrote:
> Any ideas how to go about it?

The [value] object will likely help you, along with [select] and
[trigger] (which can be abbreviated to [v], [sel] and [t]).  Remember to
use $0 in the name of the [v], if you want multiple instances of your
patch or abstraction to be independent.

A pattern you might find useful is:

control message
 |
[t b      a]
 |        |
[value x] |
 |        |
some process
 |
[t b f]
 | /
[value x]
 |
updated value


Claude
--
https://mathr.co.uk


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list



--
---
skype:esajuhaniruoho // http://esaruoho.tumblr.com/ // iMessage: esaruoho@gmail.com //