instead i would say that it is a good tool if you can formulate the problem like this: "I have a cool patch X that works great with the desired latency. I have another cool patch Y that also works nicely. But if I use them together, things start to fall apart." then you could run e.g. patch Y in a separate [pd~] instance.
Hi, List !
I stumbled over one question recently, regarding [pd~].
PD (with Audio operations) and PD with video (GEM) are best run in 2 seperate instances of PD, right ? (As video operations can cause audio dropouts)
So, given these informations about [pd~], running a GEM patch inside an audio PD patch using [pd~) is not going to be better than having audio and video in the same patch, right ? (because [pd~] is synchronous to its parent)
So, for an "asynchronous" situation, i still need to start two seperate instances of PD to keep audio and video truly seperated ?
Thanks for clarifications !
Best
Oliver