hello!<br><div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
By using [block~ 1], you&#39;re<br>
increasing the number of clock calls, and the arithmetic for finding<br>
an index is kind of wasted since the block is only one sample long.<br>
Maybe it would be best to avoid [block~] and bang vsnapshot~ with a<br>
metro set to 1/44.1 ms.  You&#39;d at least be reducing the number of<br>
clock_getlogicaltime() calls.<br></blockquote><div> Thanks for that. I had no idea that there would be a difference between the two.<br><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

All this being said, the CPU load difference between these setups is<br>
basically nothing on my 2.5GHz MacBook Pro.  I guess the differences<br>
would start to emerge if you compared dozens of instances of each.<br></blockquote><div>Yeah, in my tests i got notable differences from about 512 to 1024 instances.<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">

<br>
Hope that helps...<font color="#888888"><br>
</font></blockquote>Not only did it help, it made my day. I hope the time you spend peaking in the code will be useful to you and others.<br><br><br>Thank you<br></div><br>-- <br>ypatios<br>