Likewise. Is there anyone opposing?
On 13.08.2018 13:23, Matt Davey wrote:
> Totally agree with Dan on all points.
>
> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 at 12:32, Dan Wilcox <danomatika@gmail.com
> <mailto:danomatika@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> My 2 cents:
>
> * "subpatch" to me refers to [pd ...] aka a patch within a patch,
> saved within the same patch file that uses it (no object instantiation)
>
> * "abstraction" to me refers to a patch saved to and loaded from
> it's own file (object instantiation)
>
> * using "subpatches and abstractions" when referring to both is the
> is the best option, I agree that "subwindow" is problematic since
> there multiple types of things displayed in multiple windows already
> (ie. the audio dialog could conceptually be a subwindow as well...)
>
> * my preference is for "subpatch" as opposed to "sub-patch"
>
> * "canvas" is problematic as there are already two notions of canvas
> within Pd: the Pd patch canvas and the TK drawing canvas
>
>> On Aug 12, 2018, at 11:40 PM, pd-list-request@lists.iem.at
>> <mailto:pd-list-request@lists.iem.at> wrote:
>>
>> Message-ID: <40aca4a4-d098-f49b-4914-46180e74dc56@revolwear.com
>> <mailto:40aca4a4-d098-f49b-4914-46180e74dc56@revolwear.com>>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>>
>> I see, then maybe we are better off without umbrella term and just
>> refer
>> to subpatches and abstractions as "subpatches and abstractions".
>>
>> m.
>
> --------
> Dan Wilcox
> @danomatika <http://twitter.com/danomatika>
> danomatika.com <http://danomatika.com>
> robotcowboy.com <http://robotcowboy.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at <mailto:Pd-list@lists.iem.at> mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list