In pd_defaultbang, what is the reasoning for calling the list method with a null selector while calling the
anything method with an "&s_bang" selector?
Christof
Ah, sorry, I misread you're last reply. I thought you were
repeating your first question :-)
Did you read the discussion I've linked too? To quote Miller:
I'm not sure this is a real problem - _anything and _list methods simply aren't guaranteed
anything about the "s" argument - it shouldn't ever be dereferenced.
I think this is the answer to your question. Since the
selector of a list message is actually redundant, you're free
to pass NULL.
Christof
> There has been a discussion about this in
the past and I have agree with IOhannes that Pd
shouldn't send NULL selectors: https://sourceforge.net/p/pure-data/patches/555/.
> Christof
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list