26 Sep
2008
26 Sep
'08
6:25 p.m.
IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
but of course you proposal to use another source for synching the outputs is the way to go.
yeah, i kind of realised this one as well...
hm. are all the [~] objects going to trigger before or after all the message-rate objects? is that much defined? or could there be interleaved [~] and message-rate object firings? eg an [env~] fires before a [* ] which is then followed by another [env~]?
d
--
damian stewart | skype: damiansnz | damian@frey.co.nz
frey | live art with machines | http://www.frey.co.nz