hello<br><br>im sorry i left the thread for some time now.<br>thank you all very much for your replies.<br><br>Your results are confirmed here too: the two methods with vsnapshot~  and writing-reading to a table are equally inefficient.<br>
Matt&#39;s suggestion --whilst much more efficient-- has a serious disadvantage: it seems that there is no way of reseting [max~ ] without losing some samples (which could include a &quot;peak&quot;).<br>Generally, i had many confusing problems while testing that one. Has anyone else tried it??<br>
<br>I give up for now due to the lack of time<br>if anyone has another idea, please share! :-)<br><br>(By the way: there is another limitation i noticed in [bang~ ]: it won&#39;t go faster than 1 bang every 64 samples, even if the block size is set under that)<br>
<br><br>thanks again<br><br>alabala<br><br>-- <br>ypatios<br>