I made a lot of assumptions about Laus program there - but wouldn't a 5ms fade out and in cause a nasty 'drop out' ? A 10ms gap is certainly something you'd hear, and I guessed Lau was trying for a perfectly smooth join. (?)
On Fri, 13 Jun 2008 13:51:39 -0500 "Kyle Klipowicz" kyleklip@gmail.com wrote:
Am I missing something or wouldn't it be simplest to add a quick and dirty 5 ms or so fade in/out envelope that follows the timing of the array triggers?
~Kyle
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Andy Farnell padawan12@obiwannabe.co.uk wrote:
Hi Lau,
I guess you're building a beat concatenator so you have no room for introducing timing offsets.
First, termminology - let's not call these "clips", I think discontinuities is a better word.
Your first solution is similar to what is being discussed in another thread on dynamic delays - Millers "rendezvous" algorithm where the two segments are spliced via a DC offset introduced by a ramp.
The second one really amounts to crossfading or short window average filter. Further, how can you be sure your detector won't have a false positive from a fast signal slew rate?
If my assumption is right then for simplicity I suggest revising your constraints. A 64 sample crossfade will introduce negligable timing problems.
-- Use the source
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
--
http://perhapsidid.wordpress.com http://myspace.com/kyleklipowicz