I too recently had problems with using unique creation sends in subpatches. I was trying to create things like [s $0-blarg] in the subpatch, but they end up looking like [s 0-blarg]. I found a workaround using add2 messages and just making the message explicitly without dollarsigns, then banging it. Attached is a patch that does this, hopefully it will work for now.
On 8/12/06, Thomas Grill gr@grrrr.org wrote:
Hi Julian,
i have no aversion to using [dyn~] - but i'll be calling numerous instantiations of this abstraction, and i've found before that using [dyn~] in that situation is a bit slow ... so i'd prefer to use patch messages if i can ...
could you send me such an example where dyn~ is noticeably slower than patch messages? If possible i would like to improve the situation.
greetings, Thomas
-- Thomas Grill http://grrrr.org
PD-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list