> Sorry, yes pd-extended 0.44. 

sure, but when I first mentioned about versions, I was thinking about cyclone's own version number.

I assume there's one, right? And I also assume you have it for download somewhere for people to include it in Pd Vanilla. Where can we get it?

If Extended keeps on delaying too much for an update, I'm gonna start just getting all the libraries I use into vanilla :(

cheers

ps. while we're at it, I have a question, are [lores~] and [reson~] perfect copies of the Max's objects, same formula and everything, or just something similar? 

thanks



2014-12-14 6:35 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl>:
Hi Alexandre,

> Awesome, can't wait for the new release :)
>
>> The source I am using is some 0.44 version.
>
> You mean the 0.44.0 extended, right?

Sorry, yes pd-extended 0.44. If all these objects were in vanilla, our
world would look quite different :-)
>
> Well, I guess the next step is to see if we can get a new Pd Extended
> soon, and hopefully in pace with the current 0.46 version.
>
> But this is another discussion.
>
By making these kinds of changes and improvements, we can make a new
release more worthwhile, and thus increase the change it will happen ;-)

> Thanks

Greetings,

Fred Jan
>
> 2014-12-13 16:53 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl
> <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>:
>
>     Hi Alexandre,
>
>     > Hi, I re-sending (or forwarding) my first message about cartopol, with
>     > the patch I had attached to exemplify the issue. My message was brief
>     > then, but it said it all.
>     >
>     The message was clear, surely with the additional info. Attached is an
>     image of your patch with a modified poltocar~.
>     >
>     > Now, I'm assuming that the version in 0.43 is the latest and is the one
>     > you have. About the bug list then, the right thing to do would be to
>     > take [cartopol~] out of the list and just keep [poltocar~], saying
>     > something like "wrong conversion".
>
>     The source I am using is some 0.44 version. The final code patch should
>     be based on the svn code. Not much difference is to be expected here.
>     >
>     > I haven't checked the code. But the formulas are pretty simple, just
>     > basically sine and cosine, so you can't go wrong by fixing it. There
>     > must be a minus sing somewhere where it didn't belong, just take it out.
>
>     Indeed it is (poltocar.c:35):
>
>             *out2++ = -am * sinf(ph);  /* CHECKED */
>
>     Removing the minus and recompiling made your patch work as expected.
>     Added some info to the sourceforge bug "#1128 still on cartopol~ /
>     poltocar~".
>
>     >
>     > Cheers
>
>     Greetings,
>
>     Fred Jan
>     >
>     > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>     > From: *Alexandre Torres Porres* <porres@gmail.com <mailto:porres@gmail.com> <mailto:porres@gmail.com
>     <mailto:porres@gmail.com>>>
>     > Date: 2014-12-08 20:37 GMT-02:00
>     > Subject: Re: [PD] Cyclone suite initiative
>     > To: Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>
>     <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>>
>     > Cc: pd-list@mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at>
>     <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at <mailto:pd-list@mail.iem.at>>
>     >
>     > cartopol~ and poltocar~ are also buggy
>     >
>     > I pointed it out once, but only cartopol~ was corrected and it made it
>     > worse. check atatchment.
>     >
>     > do you have this covered?
>     >
>     > cheers
>     >
>     > 2014-12-08 14:30 GMT-02:00 Fred Jan Kraan <fjkraan@xs4all.nl <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>
>     > <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl <mailto:fjkraan@xs4all.nl>>>:
>     >
>     >     Hi Alexandre,
>     >
>     >     Thanks for the report.
>     >
>     >     Next to working on the help-patches, I am working on creating
>     such a
>     >     list. I'll put it somewhere public when the patches are done.
>     >
>     >     So when you find any others, I would like to know.
>     >
>     >     Greetings,
>     >
>     >     Fred Jan
>     >
>     >     > hi, you probably know about this bug, but [rand~]'s argument
>     doesn't
>     >     > really work. I'd be happy to help find other bugs, do you have a
>     >     list of
>     >     > bugs you're working on?
>     >     >
>     >     > cheers
>     >     >
>     >
>     >
>