On 12/7/06, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mathieu Bouchard</b> &lt;<a href="mailto:matju@artengine.ca">matju@artengine.ca</a>&gt; wrote:<div><span class="gmail_quote"></span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>what's a lot more surprising is that<br><br>[pix_video]<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;|<br>[pix_gain]<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;|<br>[t a a]<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp; |<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;|&nbsp;&nbsp;[pix_invert]<br>&nbsp;&nbsp;|<br>[pix_record]<br><br>actually applies [pix_invert], because gem messages handle pix (and all
<br>the other state) by pointer, so that the pix seemingly sent from<br>[pix_gain] to [pix_record] is actually modified although the message sent<br>isn't modified.<br><br>This doesn't necessarily happen in other video plugins.
</blockquote><div><br>Reversing the order of pix_invert and pix_record won't apply the inversion though.&nbsp; That would be consistent with the rest of Pd messaging right?<br></div><br></div><br>