7 Dec
2006
7 Dec
'06
7:07 p.m.
On 12/7/06, Mathieu Bouchard matju@artengine.ca wrote:
what's a lot more surprising is that
[pix_video] | [pix_gain] | [t a a] | | | [pix_invert] | [pix_record]
actually applies [pix_invert], because gem messages handle pix (and all the other state) by pointer, so that the pix seemingly sent from [pix_gain] to [pix_record] is actually modified although the message sent isn't modified.
This doesn't necessarily happen in other video plugins.
Reversing the order of pix_invert and pix_record won't apply the inversion though. That would be consistent with the rest of Pd messaging right?