Le 28/02/2016 13:26, Alessio Degani via Pd-list a écrit :
> On 27/02/2016 16:35, IOhannes m zmölnig wrote:
>> On 02/27/2016 12:05 PM, Alessio Degani via Pd-list wrote:
>>> Is there a simple way to chek if a pd patch is made only using vanilla
>>> object?
>
> Hi IOhannes,
>
>> as in: install Pd-vanilla, start it with "-noprefs -verbose" and load
>> the patch?
> Thank you for the answer.
> That works. But how about a more direct "this patch uses the following libs/extern: ...".
> Do you think that is feasible?
this is certainly possible, if someone spend time working on this.
but my concern is : why is this important?

i mean : if you don't care about conservation or portability, just start pd loading a maximum of externals and use all of them.

but if you do care about conservation or portability, then load pd with only a minimal set of externals, and "declare" the other only when you need them.

So, my advice is :
better than making a mess and try to fix it latter, it's easier to make things clean in the 1st time.

cheers
c


> Maybe in a future release of pd
>
> Cheers
>
>> then see if any object couldn't create.
>> then check the Pd-console to see where it found the objects that it
>> could create, and check whether any of those are outside your patch path.
>>
>>
>>
>> gfmsarI
>> IOhannes
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pd-list@lists.iem.at  mailing list
>> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
> --
> a.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
> UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list