Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific.
Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as an argument?



Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 23:55, Roman Haefeli <reduzent@gmail.com> a écrit :
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
> Of course [once] would be much better than [lock]....

[once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence
should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new
objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a
[once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move.

Roman_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list