Yes I realized that. So it should be something more specific. Why not a wider scope object, like [pdconfig], that would take "once" as an argument?
Antoine Rousseau http://www.metalu.net http://metalu.net __ http://www.metaluachahuter.com/ http://www.metaluachahuter.com/compagnies/al1-ant1/
Le sam. 22 sept. 2018 à 23:55, Roman Haefeli reduzent@gmail.com a écrit :
On Sat, 2018-09-22 at 23:29 +0200, Antoine Rousseau wrote:
Of course [once] would be much better than [lock]....
[once] is taken by iemlib. Not that I think every library in existence should be considered regarding name conflicts when introducing new objects to Pd, but I feel that [once] is in wide use and adding a [once] with totally different behavior would be a bold move.
Roman_______________________________________________ Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list