On Sat, 17 Oct 2009, dmotd wrote:
i understand yr frustration with the pdpedia, but i am still of the belief that pd and its numerous (count thousands) of objects (and abstractions) do need a pure reference online, and i do believe the wiki format suits maintaining a said reference.
If only a PdPedia meeting could occur so that all participants can finally agree that PdPedia is not gonna go anywhere and is taking the energy and attention away from improving the currently most-up-to-date documentation sources...
However, googlable online docs would still be a good idea, as long as it is all done automatically, so that it doesn't duplicate any efforts, doesn't splinter other documentation projects, and doesn't cause headaches on how to merge the different documentation sources together. Edition features can be replaced by appropriate mailing-lists and enough svn accesses for everybody.
*-help.pd files need your help.
_ _ __ ___ _____ ________ _____________ _____________________ ... | Mathieu Bouchard, Montréal, Québec. téléphone: +1.514.383.3801