You're right, it works fine know.
I'm feeling much better know!
Thanks!

Pierre

2010/11/23 <martin.peach@sympatico.ca>

Maybe you need to re-instantiate the delay; it works fine here (Pd version 0.42.5-extended-rc6 on WinXp), all your examples work.

Martin

________________________________
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:59:51 +0100
> From: pimassat@gmail.com
> To: martin.peach@sympatico.ca
> CC: pd-list@iem.at
> Subject: Re: [PD] Deep thinking ... Problem with ADSR
>
> Oh, I didn't know that. Still, putting a bang between [1 10( and the
> delay doesn't make any difference. I'd tried that, and was very
> confused.
>
> 2010/11/23 >
>
> You need to put a bang before the delay, otherwise the [1 10( message
> sets the delay to 1ms.
>
> Martin
>
>
> ________________________________
> > Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:37:35 +0100
> > From: pimassat@gmail.com
> > To: pd-list@iem.at
> > Subject: [PD] Deep thinking ... Problem with ADSR
> >
> > Dear List,
> >
> > I was trying to build a simple (very simple) metronome using [metro] to
> > see if i could change the speed without having to reset the metro
> > object (has this changed in 0.42 by the way?). In order to test it i
> > need an equally simple ADSR upon an oscillator to hear the bangs.
> >
> > Now please look at the attached patch because i don't understand why it
> > won't work. I'm very confused...
> >
> > Pierre
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> Pd-list@iem.at mailing
> > list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> > http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Pd-list@iem.at mailing
> list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list