On 2016-09-29 10:02, José Rafael Subía Valdez wrote:
> I solved this by
> setting a short delay after the [init]
this (forcing events into the correct order by adding indefined delays
here and there) is generally a bad idea.
a better one would be to signal via an explicit message to the readers
that data is now available.
hmsdf
IOhannes
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list