On Wed, 9 Mar 2011, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
so who is the most competent person for a certain ticket? and can we expect a submitter to know?
There is no book.
I don't know what you mean. I don't recall ever allowed to assign anything to anyone, in the 6 years or so that I had been on SF.net/projects/pure-data. I assume that it stayed the same ever after I cancelled my SF.net account.
So, I assumed that one of the admins' first task was to filter through the new tickets to weed out spam, mistakes, and dispatch according to how members want to get the tasks split. I took "assigned to" as being a sign that the admins are approving the issue for further consideration.
So why do you say that if non-admins aren't allowed to select "assigned to" ? And then obviously, if I'm talking about getting someone to set the "assigned to" status, does it look like I'm talking about submitters setting their own "assigned to" ? I'm talking about why don't admins do any kind of dispatch.
(e.g. if they haven't read the book of rules in pd-dev)
There is no such book.
"commit time" referred to the time where the ticket was initially opened (which might not have been clear either)
Ah ok. I never see the word "commit" used for that.
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC