can you give details on what version of pd you have, and like a screenshot or something with the parameters?
the code from that file does get the sample rate from the soundfile into an "insample" variable, so it looks like it should work, but I haven't thoroughly tested it yet.
you can also open an issue at
https://github.com/porres/pddp
sending us the sample you're using and everything.
cheers
Em sex., 28 de abr. de 2023 às 11:44, Patco colet.patrice@gmail.com escreveu:
In fact we have encountered problems specifically with my favorite PureData patch, the phase-vocoder, used for many different purposes, particulary with location scrolling, usefull for network time-stretch sample reading, speed is not as same as original soundfile when samplerate is 48000hz.
best
Pat
Le 24 avr. 2023 à 11:01, Miller Puckette mpuckette@cloud.ucsd.edu a
écrit :
Yep... these patches date back to before that outlet :)
For now it migth suffice to mention that the patches only work on 44k1
soundfiles... and incidentally, thee best one (teh phase vocoder) works fine on 48K files, you just have to adjust the transposition by 147 cents.
cheers
Miller
On 4/23/23 03:47, Patco wrote:
Hello,
I've found something awkward in all fft patches from 03.audio-examples
that leads to mistakes.
Samplerate is hardcoded to 44100, so this wouldn't work correctly when
opening soundfiles having another samplerate.
This should be corrected by using [soundfiler] second outlet instead
of hardcoding samplerate.
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list__;!...
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list