nice!!
i did try the samplerate thing, but without your 0xff and /256 additions, it was sounding awful.
this sounds pretty rad now.
On 10/18/2011 03:36 AM, hardoff goes bananas wrote:lower samplerates are possible with smaller numbers as input for the
> the main dilemma here is that the patch runs at normal samplerate and
> bitrate.
"counter", and rounding to int
i got it a little closer to the original after applying & 0xff like in
> i think to get the sound close to the original code examples, you're going
> to have to somehow force the calculations all to be done with 8bit floats,
> rather than pd's internal 32 bit (or whatever)
> I still can't get my head around how to do that.
the javascript on the site, and dividing by 256 (instead of scaling by
256 to fit into short), maybe there is still a lsb/msb issue though.
bis denn!
martin
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list