Em sex., 16 de fev. de 2024 às 04:39, cyrille henry <ch@chnry.net> escreveu:
Le 15/02/2024 à 06:19, Alexandre Torres Porres a écrit :
I don't understand what is a "spring link motion".
Masses moves according to newton law.
Lot's of different behaviours can be modelled with MSS model...

Sorry, I'm just missing the basics so I can even properly elaborate meaningful questions. I've been avoiding getting into Physical Modelling Synthesis but I guess it's finally time to get into it :)
 
you can have a look at few of chdh work :
https://vimeo.com/130239547
http://chdh.net/video_spin.php#;
this is 100% scanned synthesis.

This is amazing, congrats, it made me nostalgic and miss PdCon concerts.

you probably noticed that they all use the same equation

not at all :)
 
The 1st is just a very basic implementation : it's not possible to define a non-linear link for example.
The 2nd one solve them in a very simple scenario : 1 mass and 1 spring. So it's not possible to create other network.

thanks for clarifying
 
But if you just want to play with meaningful parameter without understanding the physics, then pmpd is not for you.

This is what I realize, and I would also like to have some higher level ready made and easy to use toys for simple tasks.
 
there are lot's of software dedicated to MSS, the equations are all about the same.
But physical modelling is broader than MSS.

sure, I see

Thanks for the references and answers.