Oh, OK!  Understood. Thanks for clarifying.

Brady

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017, 2:30 PM Simon Iten <itensimon@gmail.com> wrote:
On 18 Dec 2017, at 14:33, Brady Sharp <bradysharp@gmail.com> wrote:

Using the dynamically-created solution in my example let's everything work as it should.  That abstraction passes audio right after creation, without having to toggle DSP, or save, or anything else.
the point that johannes makes is, that you are toggling the dsp by creating new objects.


I think it would be an improvement for a basic routing abstraction to work as it should, and not have someone learn dynamic patching to get around it, which is why I brought it up, but I'm personally fine with my workaround.

Thanks again!

Brady

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:46 AM, IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at> wrote:
On 2017-12-18 00:45, Brady Sharp wrote:
>  I'd rather not toggle DSP,
> since I could be in the midst of recording a long loop or something

but you already do (by whatever you do to make Pd aware of new signal
processing objects).
or am i missing something ( i *might* be).

fgasdmr
IOhannes


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list




--
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list