>One thing that's confusing in compiling is which m_pd.h to >use. It looks like your pd-lib-builder found m_pd.h from >Pd extended



I`m not sure.

I compiled with this dir struct:

blah/downloads/pd 1
blah/downloads/pd-cyclone-master


I think that's the priority in pd-lib-builder/Makefile.pdlibbuilder BUT is true that I have “extended” installed.

Right?

Or I uninstall “extended”?

1  0.47.1


Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.



From: Matt Barber <brbrofsvl@gmail.com>
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2016 7:52 PM
To: Alexandre Torres Porres
Cc: Lucas Cordiviola; pd-list@lists.iem.at
Subject: Re: [PD] Proposing a cyclone update / another Pre Alpha release (milestone 2)
 
A lot of them just drop the relevant m_pd.h into the project itself, which is certainly doable.

On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> wrote:
i mean, fix in the makefile, apparently there's a way to specify a subfolder with the pd source into our project

2016-10-03 16:45 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>:
yeah, we gotta fix that in pd-lib-builder ourselves, and provide the pd source from vanilla for it to check in a subfolder, that's the safest thing to do, so lets jump to that ;)

thanks

2016-10-03 16:26 GMT-03:00 Matt Barber <brbrofsvl@gmail.com>:
Thanks, Lucas. There are some useful things here, and I see a few things to fix, especially with implicit casting.

One thing that's confusing in compiling is which m_pd.h to use. It looks like your pd-lib-builder found m_pd.h from Pd extended, which may break things in cases where we're using the updated one from newer vanillas. If you have vanilla installed, there's a way to fix it by changing the code in pd-lib-builder/Makefile.pdlibbuilder, lines 562-567:
Here's the current:

  ifndef pdincludepath
    pdincludepath := $(shell ls -d "$(PROGRAMFILES)/pd/include/pdextended")
  endif
  ifndef pdincludepath
    pdincludepath := $(shell ls -d "$(PROGRAMFILES)/pd/src")
  endif

I think you can just comment out the first three lines, or move them below the next three.

Much appreciated.

Matt