Alexandre Quessy wrote:
So, every [pix_*] object behave like this ?
at least each and every pix_fx (there might be one or 2 pix_objects that
do not behave like that, probably [pix_draw] and [pix_texture], i really
dunno. all other pix_objects behave like that (the joys of inheritance)
Does it save on CPU+RAM performance when it is set to 0 ?
well it just ignores the actual processing for this object. this means
it doesn't do anything but pass the gemlist on (so yes, this saves CPU+RAM)
Otherwise, would [spygot] be more suitable ? For instance, does change
the gemlist path with spygot create new instances of the gemlist
"object" every time one changes the flow ?
i am not entirely sure what you mean, but you can definitely change the
render-chain with flow-control objects like [spigot], [demux],
[repeat],... (the last 2 being zexy)
mfg.asd.r
IOhannes
_______________________________________________