8 Apr
2012
8 Apr
'12
9:17 p.m.
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Hans-Christoph Steiner hans@at.or.at wrote:
The main reason why this is still like this is because no one has written better code, then done thorough testing in order to prove that the new code doesn't break anything. People have written better code for this before, no one has done the thorough testing part...
Hans, can you point to such code, is there still something available somewhere? I may be able to test it using the testtools templates. Such code could be a very useful precision improvement, even though it's not the same as double precision.
Katja