I'm not entirely sure i understand your original question, but having [value $1-foo] in an abstraction used as [abs1 murgl] and a [value $2-foo] in an abstraction used as [anotherabs qaex murgl] will certainly have both instances of [value] reference the *same* value (just as [value murgl-foo] will reference the same value)
Am 14. November 2014 20:44:10 MEZ, schrieb Iain Mott mott@reverberant.com:
Sorry, not thinking very well - yes there is, using send and receive rather than value.
Em Sex, 2014-11-14 às 17:10 -0200, Iain Mott escreveu:
Hi list - In two different abstractions, I would like to use dollar signs in the names of "value" objects. As I understand it, the value object usually has global scope, however it doesn't seem to work that way across abstractions when a dollar sign referencing the same
creation
argument is incorporated in the name.
eg. if i give a value object in two abstractions the name argument "$1_started", where $1 is a file name referenced by the two, the
value
of the value objects of the abstractions don't confer when one is changed. Is there a way around this problem?
Thanks, iain
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
mfg.ugd.fhj IOhannes
-- Sent from my pdp-11