On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, patko wrote:
I also tried with matju to link gem.dll, with no successfull results, apparently it depends on characters surounding function names we get with pexport,
I think that for the case of C, it's not so hard but it involves stdcall and/or cdecl options.
The C++ case is harder, as it involves putting characters in symbols that aren't allowed in C++, therefore we can't fake the symbols directly from C++, and we'd have to go through .def aliases, but afaict, pexport seems to be ignoring aliases ??? (hhhhheeeeelllllppppp.....!!!!!)
And then, there are C++ exceptions...
(why are GEM binaries still getting compiled with Visual C++ ? or why whatever else in the Pd world is compiled with Visual C++ ?)
| Mathieu Bouchard ---- tél: +1.514.383.3801 ---- Villeray, Montréal, QC