Andrew Faraday wrote:

I'm fairly sure that [snapshot~] doesn't generate random numbers, but marks the current point of an audio signal.

indeed

Although this whole thing's got me thinking...
If you use [snapshot~], attached to a real world sound source [adc~] to generate random numbers, then increasing volume would increase the range of your random generation. For instance [adc~]|[snapshot~] (plus a bang)|[+ 1]|[* 10]|[int]

first of all: [adc~] is _not_ a random number generator.
it is an interface to the outside world. whatever is attached to your soundcard (or whatever feeds [adc~] will determine what comes out of [snapshot~].

e.g. if i connect [adc~] to [dac~] then i might hear whatever is recorded by my built-in microphone. i would not consider this "noise" in the strict mathematical sense.

if you connect an analog noise generator to your soundcard, then you might get a nice (and truely random, though coloured) noise.

now a real-world analog-digital converter always produces a (hopefully small) bit of thermal nose, which can be used as either a noise-source by itself (but take care, if you speak into the microphone...) or as a truely-random seed generator for a pseudo-random number generator.

the latter might give more what you would expect.

the former has (apart from the "microphone" problem) the drawback, that it will only generate a single "random" number per audio-block (or to be precise: 64 for of them); which might be just too few for your application...

In this case a sound source at a solid 1 - -1 volume (such as [osc~]) would give you a number from 0 to 20, when the bang is sent.
but a quieter sound source e.g. 0.2 - -0.2 would provide a number from 0 - 4

Anyone fault my logic?

simple primary school mathematics?
([-1..1] + 1)*10 = [0..2]*10 = [0..20]
([-0.2..0.2] + 1)*10 = [0.8..1.2]*10 = [8..12]

fmgasdr
IOhannes

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list