Do abstractions work in subprocesses? If I put an oscillator in the top level of the sub- process patch, I get audio back, but when I snapshot the output of abstractions (that I know work at the top level) I get nothing but zeros. I have added [PD DSP 1] messages to all abstractions, but still no dice.

Is there another caveat I don't know about?

Thanks

On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 10:41 PM Andrew Lyons <tstexture@gmail.com> wrote:

Ah - Ok. Yep.

Thanks!

=============================================
Andrew D Lyons | Tools Developer | http://www.tstex.com
=============================================

On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 22:19, Lucas Cordiviola <lucarda27@hotmail.com> wrote:
On 1/6/2020 2:51 AM, Andrew Lyons wrote:
> So I'm finding that patches running in pd~ subprocesses cannot read
> midi input of any kind? Does midi input need to be passed in from the
> parent patch as audio inputs?

No, why as audio input?

You can pass it as control via the first inlet.

From the [pd~]'s help file:

~~~~

Any message besides "pd~" is sent to the sub-process. For instance, the
message below sends "bar baz" to any object in the sub-process named
"foo", such as a "receive" object.

~~~

:)

Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.