Do abstractions work in subprocesses? If I put an oscillator in the top level of the sub- process patch, I get audio back, but when I snapshot the output of abstractions (that I know work at the top level) I get nothing but zeros. I have added [PD DSP 1] messages to all abstractions, but still no dice.
Is there another caveat I don't know about?
Thanks
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 10:41 PM Andrew Lyons tstexture@gmail.com wrote:
Ah - Ok. Yep.
Thanks!
============================================= Andrew D Lyons | Tools Developer | http://www.tstex.com =============================================
On Sun, 5 Jan 2020 at 22:19, Lucas Cordiviola lucarda27@hotmail.com wrote:
On 1/6/2020 2:51 AM, Andrew Lyons wrote:
So I'm finding that patches running in pd~ subprocesses cannot read midi input of any kind? Does midi input need to be passed in from the parent patch as audio inputs?
No, why as audio input?
You can pass it as control via the first inlet.
From the [pd~]'s help file:
Any message besides "pd~" is sent to the sub-process. For instance, the message below sends "bar baz" to any object in the sub-process named "foo", such as a "receive" object. ~~~ :) Mensaje telepatico asistido por maquinas.