ok, so I hit a mysterious shortcut that sent the message when I was trying to type the "~" sign. Please allow me to continue.==============request 2:A wrap function like [pong~] or [zexy/wrap].I'm actually frustrated that "fmod" behaves in way that you cannot loop between a specified range when you feed it negative values.For example sending -3.1 to [expr fmod($f1, 10)] gives -3.1, and I wanted 6.9I have been using fmod in a few patches for this purpose, but I need to do things like [expr if($f1 < 0, 100 + $f1, fmod($f1, 100))] - not the most elegant thing.This is more like the behaviour of the [mod] object in vanilla, send -3 to [mod 10] and you get 7This way you get an actual "loop" behaviour. I'd really be happy for an alternative to fmod that would work that way, but we could go further and have a new function where you specify the minimum and maximum values, like [pong~] or [zexy/wrap]. So it would take 3 arguments, (input, minumum boundary, maximum boundary).I think it is important to maintain the expr family of objects and even expand it now that Pd Extended is not in the picture anymore. I believe this raises the importance to add new features to Pd Vanilla, not to mention things like libpd...cheers2016-02-14 22:03 GMT-02:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>:Ok, I don't think I was able to get the new version working, anybody else did?This might be too late in the game, I know, but if you're including features, I have some requests.In [fexpr~], I find it would be good to set a starting value for the current sample input, you could set this via a set message and that would overwrite the signal input for that sample.You can now set just about any previous samples, but no current.I see you'd need to create a new syntax for this, something like "set in1 0.4" (to set x1[0] to 0.4)I really need this for some applications where I'm using fexpr~ as signal accumulators/counters=========A wrap function like [pong]2016-02-05 23:36 GMT-02:00 Shahrokh Yadegari <sdy@ucsd.edu>:Dear All,Attached is a pre-release of Expr 0.5 compiled for Mac os x (compiled on 10.9) and Linux (compiled on an older Cent OS). I have also attached Alexandre's big pd patch which listed the issues, with my comments.Hopefully I have addressed most of the issues that were brought up and now I am working on a more complete documentation of Expr objects. One open issue is that expr still supports no more than 10 expressions.I have provided a mechanism for local variables and abstraction substitutions ($0 and $1, $2, etc.) to work. Also, one hopefully useful new feature in V0.5 is the assign '=' operator. Now you can use expr to assign to "value"s and into arrays. So if you have a variable called 'count'"value count""expr count = count + 1"will implement a counter, raising the value of count with every "bang"You can also change values of arrays through the usual syntax."expr array1[5] = $f1"will set the sixth value (counting zero based) of the array "array1" to the incoming float value on inlet 1.I will write a more informative and comprehensive release notes along with the documentation when I pass the sources to Miller. However, I have made a few changes to the parser and I am looking for alpha-testers who can run the code and let me know if any bugs are found, specially in parsing of complex expressions.I look forward to hearing from whoever uses these objects. Please let me know if you find any bugs. (NOTE: you need to create the links for expr and fexpr~ to get the new version for those as well.)cheers,Shahrokh