hello,
how are you doing cpu load measurement?
I find it very hard to do reliable measurement of cpu load nowadays, since computer have a variable cpu speed depending on load.
For exemple, pd CPU load can be at 75%, with CPU frequency at 800MHz. When increasing the patch complexities, the CPU frequency increase, and the apparent load reported by pd decrease.
On linux, you can bloc the processor to a fixed frequency, and then make reliable load measurement.
But i don't know how to do than on OSX. Did you find a way?
otherwise, your measurement are useless.
cheers
c
Le 27/06/2016 10:44, christof.ressi@gmx.at a écrit :
Do you want to share your patch? I could test it on my machine with 0.46 and 0.47
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Gesendet: Sonntag, 26 Juni 2016 um 13:27:23 Uhr
Von: "Dario Sanfilippo" <sanfilippo.dario@gmail.com>
An: pd-list <pd-list@iem.at>
Betreff: [PD] Experiencing a higher CPU load with 0.47-0 and 0.47-1.
Hi, list.
I'm loading the same patch with 0.46-7, 0.47-0 and 0.47-1 - all 64bit. The
last two have a significantly higher CPU load. I'm on OSX 10.11.5.
Has any of you experienced anything similar?
I haven't changed my [vd~] objects into [delread4~], are they calling the
same piece of code?
The patch is almost exclusively using signal objects, have some of these
been modified in 0.47-0 and 0.47-1?
Thanks for your help.
Dario
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> https://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list