that's the only difference I can think of, but you can also just switch between tables, not sure how important this feature is, seems is just something for possible fun anyway.
cheers

2015-09-07 4:52 GMT-03:00 IOhannes m zmoelnig <zmoelnig@iem.at>:
On 2015-09-06 23:58, Alexandre Torres Porres wrote:
> yeah, I was thinking about this versatility. I guess "better" isn't a good
> word. I was thinking "more powerful"

afaict, i would say it has a single feature that is trivial to implement
for [FIR~] as well...

and if the table data itself is static¹, then it should be pretty easy
to get the desired behaviour with a wrapper abstraction around [FIR~]
that copies the data with an offset into an internal proxy table.


but well, if this is the only feature that makes [Buffir~] more powerful
than [FIR~], i will tell thomas to add it.

fgasdrm
IOhannes

¹ that is: you don't continuously change the impulse response without
telling the filter object


_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list