Martin, that's pretty good and a lot closer to how akihiko's sound than I've been able to get.Hans I've downloaded the 'many' lib and I get this error when running the 200-voices patch_______________________________________________voicetest~ 0 0 $0... couldn't create$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9... couldn't create$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9... couldn't create$1 $2 $3 $4 $5 $6 $7 $8 $9in the main patch [voicetest~ 0 0 $0] doesn't create and the variables from 1-9 are in the [voices-wrap~] instances, I'm sure you knew that.On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jeffrey Concepcion <jeffreyconcepcion@gmail.com> wrote:Hans,
Thanks for letting me know about the 'many' lib, I'll check it out.
And Martin I'll try out your patch asap. I think I read somewhere
about a [polyosc~] object or it could be a figment of my imagination.
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011, martin brinkmann <mnb@martin-brinkmann.de> wrote:
> On 07/12/2011 01:55 AM, Jeffrey Concepcion wrote:
>> Also, it seems to me that I would need
>> one oscillator per note, which is ridiculous if you want to make something
>> isn't that CPU intensive.
>
> it depends on the cpu. i have made a 'quick and dirty' cluster-synth
> patch (attached) with 192 not very (or at all) optimized oscillators,
> which produces about 20 percent load on my machine (3 ghz intel core).
> it should run on a atom-netbook. if you need more instances, it might be
> too much though. (and less voices do not sound that awful too...)
>
> another possible approach i can think of would be using ifft as a
> oscillator bank. though it is probably not trivial to calculate the
> spectrum. (or you will have to use a very large blocksize, to get enough
> 'frequency-resolution')
>
> bis denn!
> martin
>
--
www.epicjefferson.com
www.avmachinists.org Puerto Rico based Art Collective/ Non-Profit Org
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list