Hi all -
If you make a settable 'receive' and then change the setting in a context in which a message is currently passing through the receive object (not at all an unlikely thing to have happen) it will crash Pd. There are ways around this but I don't know of any that would not slow down the global functioning of Pd itself.
cheers Miller
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 07:07:28AM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: IOhannes m zmölnig zmoelnig@iem.at To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 4:03 AM Subject: Re: [PD] variable receive objects?
On 05/12/2012 07:58 PM, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
----- Original Message -----
From: Marian Wegermail@marianweger.com To: pd-list@iem.at Cc: Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:09 AM Subject: Re: [PD] variable receive objects?
hi!
 is there a way to generate a variable receive object similar to a
send via
message box, whose source is defined at load time?
use iem_receive / iem_r from iemlib.
Wow, that is classic Pd development style-- add a tiny feature to an object, but don't actually improve _that_ object.
ever thought that there might be a good reason why [r] is not seettable, and that [iem_r] - while superficially working - exposes exactly the problems of a settable [r]?
Enlighten me.
mfgadsr IOhannes
PS: there should be a discussion on this topic in the archives.
I don't find anything of the sort. Tried searching for "settable receive", "setting receive", and "iem_receive"
-Jonathan
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list