Hallo, Peter Plessas hat gesagt: // Peter Plessas wrote:
i somehow assumed, that [writesf~] doesn't use scheduled messages...
I always thought that Pd would execute messages in between audio blocks.
So if i sent two messages (stop old file, start new file), i expected
them to happen in a gap between two blocks, hence gapless recorded files
possible. Franks demonstration shows that i have to explicitly time
those messages according to a block~ (or equivalent) in order to get
this behavior. Still all blurry to me, let's look on!
Acutally I found that my patch also works without explicit block timing: Just replace the [pd blockbang~] subpatch with [bang] and see for yourself. However it fails if you try to record less than one block.
Ciao
Frank Barknecht Do You RjDj.me? _ ______footils.org__