> It would change some pretty major things in vanilla, too. For instance,
[phasor~], [osc~], and [tabosc4~] all depend on a bit-manipulation trick
to wrap phase, which won't work with doubles.
katja addressed this with Pd Double. See:
See the "benchmarks" section of that link.
-Jonathan
On Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:05 AM, Matt Barber <brbrofsvl@gmail.com> wrote:
It would change some pretty major things in vanilla, too. For instance, [phasor~], [osc~], and [tabosc4~] all depend on a bit-manipulation trick to wrap phase, which won't work with doubles. I'm not sure if the output is any different, but it does save the per-sample bounds check and is theoretically faster.