4 May
2007
4 May
'07
9:46 p.m.
Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote:
AFAIK it does not work yet - but it should not be that hard to implement ...
That does not work and would be a pain to implement.
why?
I think that there should just be a libdir called "gemabs" for those pd patches. If Gem was compiled as single-file-single-class, then this would "just work".
since Gem objects do share a lot of code, even splitting Gem into a lot of separate objects (which is planned on the long term) will still need a "core" which i would implement as a (very small) Gem.pd_linux
mfgasr IOhannes