Re: [PD] Canvas editor patch 2

Hallo, IOhannes m zmoelnig hat gesagt: // IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:

Frank Barknecht wrote:

...

(This seems to be one of the really rare cases where a dynamic receive is actually needed. Other than that, in 4-5 years of using Pd I never needed to rename a receiver. I think it's generally better to use a

i would totally agree (if i didn't use dynamic senders/receivers myself sometimes)

Note that I consider dynamic *senders* to be very useful, Sending to different targets is as natural as talking to different people.

I just don't like changing receivers. Renaming a receiver-name to me more feels like doing this kind of conversation:

• "Hi, I'm Frank, may I help you?"

• "Yes, could you explain Pd's data structures a bit, Frank?"

• "Sorry, who are you talking to? I'm Matju now. And data structures suck."

Ciao

Matju Barknecht _ ______footils.org_ __goto10.org__