Hi Julian,

I've never used [cos~], can you explain to me why an [osc~] with the correct phase cannot do the trick?

Cheers

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Julian Brooks <jbeezez@gmail.com> wrote:

Some good stuff here, thanks people.

[osc~] doesn't appear to take arguments so that's out.

I don't doubt Alexandre's ears or thoroughness but in this instance,when replacing [cos~] with [osc~] there's a big difference in the sound.

Alexandros - thanks for the sketch, yes it does make sense, webpd has no [until] or [cos].

Joe- nice implementation, again unfortunately there's no [abs~] or [wrap~].

What I do think from the hints and suggestions given is that I've got enough to be getting on with to make something approximately close and hopefully interesting.

Thanks all for suggestions so far,

Julian

On 24 August 2015 at 10:30, Joe White <white.joe4@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Julian,

I've attached an optimised implementation for [cos~] that we've been using for Heavy. It's an approximate taylor series expansion but it should be much faster than just using cosf(). Hopefully webpd supports [abs~] and [wrap~].

Cheers,

Joe

On 24 August 2015 at 09:18, Alexandros Drymonitis <adrcki@gmail.com> wrote:

what about this?

[table_size(
|

[until]
|

[f]x[+ 1]
|

[t f f]__________
|                         |

[/ table_size]      |
|                         |

[* twoPi]             |
|                         |

[cos]                  |
|                         |

[tabwrite table name]

well, ASCII patches don't look so good, but I hope you get the picture.

On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> wrote:

cause I made some tests, [osc~] will give the same result as [cos~]... 

2015-08-24 3:26 GMT-03:00 Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com>:

> Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after

how is that?

2015-08-23 17:35 GMT-03:00 Julian Brooks <jbeezez@gmail.com>:

Alexandre & Alexandros,

Cheers for pitching in.

It's for a random bleepy patch. 

Unfortunately [osc~] doesn't have the tonal quality I'm after - good idea though.

On 23 August 2015 at 20:53, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> wrote:

i do realize that, but who knows what he needs this for, it may work... :)

2015-08-23 16:37 GMT-03:00 Alexandros Drymonitis <adrcki@gmail.com>:

On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Alexandre Torres Porres <porres@gmail.com> wrote:

you can treat [osc~] as [cos~]

just give it a frequency of "0" and use the phase inlet as the angle input (from 0 to 1). 

But the phase inlet of [osc~] is a control inlet, and [cos~] takes signals..

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list

--

Sébastien Piquemal

 ----- @sebpiq

 ----- http://github.com/sebpiq

 ----- http://funktion.fm

_______________________________________________
Pd-list@lists.iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list