Le 3 juin 08 à 21:36, Steffen Juul a écrit :
On 03/06/2008, at 20.48, Steffen Juul wrote:
On 02/06/2008, at 14.25, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote:
if you (or anybody else) finds more bugs till tomorrow
Has something happened to [pix_data] since GEM: ver: 0.91-cvs GEM: compiled: May 21 2008 ? (I can't see anything in the Changelog.)
I have a patch that uses that where the output is very different between the two versions.
Have you screenshots before/after ?
Maybe i should add that there is also a [pix_contrast] involved. The chain all in all is:
[gemhead] [pix_image] [pix_contrast] [pix_texture] [square] [pix_data]
No problem, with this chain on MacOSX.4.11, Powerbook G4, Pd version
0.40.3-extended-20080601, GEM: ver: 0.91.0 'tigital' compiled: Jun 1
2008
++
Jack
Pd-list@iem.at mailing list UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management -> http://lists.puredata.info/ listinfo/pd-list